
Today at 18.00 I responded to a request from my client for ideas to present to business leaders at an investment bank. These leaders are being addressed to encourage them into getting involved with the conservative political agenda 'The Big Society'.
I listed a range of thoughts and resources that I thought might spark some interest from the assembled great and good in the world of finance but felt that the opening thesis behind the term Big Society was both vague and where specific, immature. But professional ethics guided me to give some positive ideas to hopefully give my client a strong position to address what is likely to be a tough audience.
A little later 19.05 to be precise the TV new announced that the Conman addressed parliament to announce his vision for Public Health Reform and illustrating how his Big Society experiment will work in practice - and on a grand scale. From what I understand he aims to take a market centric approach to putting the health service in the hand of the doctors that use the service. I think that this is questionable as a recent survey stated that one in eight doctors earn over £250,000 per year and this reform will give these professionals more earning power. Business and Health should not mix but for this government they are ethically wedded to the business incentive behind civil society (can anybody see the inherent contradiction?). The issue is the with more economic incentive for doctors to manage the health service there could be conflict between patients and their doctors over access to drugs and impartial advice - seems logical. If this is the the first Big Move for the Conman's Big Society I fear that we the people will be up against it once again.